Sunday, November 22, 2015

Tragedy of the Commons - The closest thing to balance and fairness.

Blog Post #12

            This week in class on Thursday was very engaging as we tackled the underlining concept behind Garrett Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” discussion. Generally, the idea behind Hardin’s essay states that people acting without the overall interests of the community as a whole is essentially devastating as the cons of certain things would be distributed unevenly. For example, let’s say one actor (A) own a farm up river and actor (B) owns a farm down river. The relationship is good between the two farms until the farmer A decides to increase the amount of cattle grazing on the grass and eventually overgrazes leading to erosion and runoff flowing into the river. Without any sort of regulation, this problem increases overtime until farmer B notices the effects down river and their water source suffers due to farmer A’s decisions. Not only did farmer A overgraze, but also because they only had their own profits in mind, it led to an unbalance and harm onto the local neighbors. Rather than distributing the pros and cons with some sort of regulation, the farmer A’s decision left the entire community in peril.

            Clearly, this is an essay that underlines the obvious reasons we have some sort of coercion with one another. Without it, clearly society would cease to exist and everything would turn to chaos. The question remains then as to what sort of regulations should be implemented. The only solution all encompassing solution is that each situation much be discussed case specific. Local differences call for different strategies. Having said that, what do we do about tackling large issues such as climate change? A lot of the challenges come with implementing such a world widespread concern. Then again, looking back at the ozone layer issue, one can see that we fixed the ozone without much dispute. In class, we discovered that because the ozone is such a clear distinct cause and focus it was easier to focus attention on a single solution. Climate change on the other hand isn’t just a hole in the sky one can see on a chart, but a culmination of numerous factors coming from virtually every inch of the planet. This is why I am hopeful for the up and coming UNFCCC meetings. It seems clear that big issues call for big solutions and I find the only way for people to actually set up something effective is by coerced agreement. Hopefully, all countries will come to agree on something. I just can’t keep sitting here any longer for chaos to unfold!
google.images

No comments:

Post a Comment